Patterico Steps In The Shit Twice More

In the comments to the post "My Defense To Patterico's Dishonest Attack," Patterico claims I lied about not deleting comments on my blog.

His smoking gun proof is this comment from I post I did on July 26, 2006, which states:

This post has been removed by the author.

By Adam S., at 11:41 AM

That's right. This guy really is that dumb and fevered. He spent all sorts of time weeding through 7 months of comments and then misreads the single sentence notation that "the author" chose to delete his own comment. The author in this case was some guy named Adam S. - whoever the hell that is. It wasn't me. Maybe he's too dumb to understand that this blog allowed commenters the freedom to not only comment but to remove their comments if they so chose. Regardless, here's evidence - once again - of a stone, cold lie by Patterico about me.

Patterico has also made the unequivocal statement that I and webhub are the same person because we entered his blog through the same ISP address. As his readers are well aware, nothing gives Patterico a woody like throwing out an allegation of sockpuppetry.

But once again, facts intruded on Pat's fanatical theorizing. Both webhub and I debunked his sockpuppet fetish and, in his journey through my comments thread, he probably saw all the comments by webhub which would leave no doubt in any sane person's mind that he is definitely not me.

Of course, Pat - the proud man of principle - can't admit he was wrong on this charge. He now goofily states, "we’ll give him the benefit of the doubt." No thanks.

Pat's been proven out-and-out wrong three times in the course of a couple of days.

It's Pat who - as evidenced by these posts - has the history of dishonesty and a lack of principle.