Macswain

Monday, November 07, 2005

More Plainspeak from Bush

Remember how America was sold Bush as a plain spoken Texan.

Today Bush says: "Any activity we conduct is within the law. We do not torture."

But what the fuck does this man mean when he uses the word "torture"? Undoubtedly, its some technical, legalistic argument and not what I or, I would venture, the majority of Americans would think of as torture.

UPDATE: Bush also stated: "I did not have torturous relations with Khalid Sheik Mohammed." (courtesy of Webhub).

4 Comments:

  • didn't Vice just say on Friday or Saturday that the US needs a torture exception?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:13 AM  

  • "I did not have torturous relations with that prisoner!"

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:17 AM  

  • According to the 2002 memoranda prepared by the Office of Legal Counsel, torture only includes the infliction of pain associated with “permanent and serious physical damage” that “must rise to the level of death, organ failure, or the permanent impairment of a significant body function” (pp. 5-6). If you're interested, here is a more complete description of the white house torture memos and their elaboration on the definition of:

    http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/01/understanding-olc-torture-memos-part-i.html

    According to the Office of Legal Counsel, torture does not include conduct which is "cruel, inhuman and degrading." In his testimony before Congress, Alberto Gonzalez refused to agree that such conduct as intentional cigarette burns or a needle under the fingernails would constitute torture, presumably because it would not rise to the level of organ failure or death.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:20 PM  

  • That was: http://balkin.blogspot.com/2005/01/understanding-olc-torture-memos-part-i.html

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:21 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home