Macswain

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

Asshats

The New York Times covers the tantrum Dennis Hastert and John Boehner are throwing over the FBI search of William Jefferson's office.

These dipshits have turned a blind eye toward torture, rendition, warrantless wiretaps of American's international calls and warrantless data mining of domestic calls only to get the red-ass when someone dares investigates Congressional corruption VIA A COURT-ISSUED, PROBABLE-CAUSE-SUPPORTED WARRANT.

Boehner - who used to hand out lobbyists' checks on the House Floor - is probably worried someone will want to peek to see if he simply moved his unethical practices into his office.

2 Comments:

  • I know you're a liberal, MacSwain, so the only part of the Constitution that concerns you are the Amendments (except the Second, of course).

    For the rest of us, though, there's a significant separation of powers issue when an Article III court authorizes an Article II officer to seize papers from the office of an Article I legislator.

    Is he guilty? Probably. But, this is where search-and-seizure law comes up.

    Publius

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:55 AM  

  • Publius,

    I fail to see where Article I gives congressmen the right to use their offices as sanctuaries for criminal activity or in which to scret criminal evidence.

    I do understand that there is an argument for concern that the executive may conduct searches for political reasons rather than legitimate concerns regarding justice. While there can be no perfect resolution, I think the checks and balances provided by having a court-ordered warrant are sufficient to typically prevent political abuse.

    By Blogger Macswain, at 10:38 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home